Best Large Capacity
LG 5.2 Cu. Ft. Front-Load Washer Review
★★★★★
9.0/10 · By Marcus Webb · Last tested: March 2026
Disclosure: This site participates in the Amazon Associates Program. We earn a commission on qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you. All reviews reflect our independent evaluation.
The LG 5.2 cu. ft. washer is the right pick when your household runs through a lot of laundry and time is an actual constraint. TurboWash 360 cuts full-load cycle times roughly in half compared to standard wash. The drum is big enough for king comforters, a week of laundry for a family of four, or multiple sets of towels in a single load. If you're running two or more loads daily, this machine earns its price difference over the 4.5 cu. ft. WM4000HBA quickly.
| Capacity | 5.2 cubic feet |
|---|---|
| Special Technology | TurboWash 360 |
| Steam | Yes |
| Smart Features | Wi-Fi, ThinQ app |
| Finish | Black Steel |
| Stackable | Yes, with compatible LG dryer |
| Energy | Energy Star certified |
The jump from 4.5 to 5.2 cubic feet isn't something you feel on a load of t-shirts and jeans. It shows up on the loads that matter: a king-sized comforter, a full set of king bedding, a week's worth of laundry for four people. In those scenarios, items that would need to be split into two loads in the smaller machine fit in one here.
That's not just about convenience. Fewer loads means less water, less detergent, less energy, and less time. If your household runs heavy laundry volume every week, the operating cost savings compound over time. The 5.2 cu. ft. model is the better financial decision for high-volume users despite the higher purchase price.
TurboWash 360 uses six water jets that hit clothes from multiple angles simultaneously. The idea is to replace soak time and repeated agitation passes with more effective water penetration upfront. The result is faster cycles without cutting cleaning steps in a way that compromises results.
We timed it against standard cycles on the same loads. A full 5.2 cu. ft. load of mixed cotton clothing ran about 28 minutes on TurboWash versus 57 minutes on the standard cycle. That matches LG's claimed times. The cleaning results on normally soiled everyday loads were indistinguishable. Heavily soiled items showed a small but noticeable difference in favor of the standard cycle, which is what LG recommends for those situations anyway.
If your household wears clothes and they mostly smell like people rather than mud or grease, TurboWash handles it without compromise.
Sports gear, children's clothing, and kitchen towels all cycled cleanly on the heavy soil setting. The steam function handles sanitizing well, which is worth noting if you're washing items that need high-temperature treatment but can't go through a hot cycle without damage.
Spin speed isn't listed prominently by LG on this model, but it runs at 1200 RPM, which is solid. Clothes come out meaningfully less wet than a top-loader, which shortens dryer time and energy use. For households running a matched LG dryer, the moisture extraction difference over a top-loader shows up in your energy bill.
The ThinQ app connects without drama. Remote start works. Cycle monitoring is accurate. The app sends a push notification when your load finishes, which sounds trivial until you've started a wash on the way out the door and want to know when to put it in the dryer.
Small households running two or three loads a week won't fully use what this machine offers. The 4.5 cu. ft. WM4000HBA handles those loads just as well at a lower price point. This is a machine for households where the washer runs every day.
The larger footprint compared to the WM4000HBA is also worth checking before you buy. Measure your laundry space. The difference is modest but real.
How much faster is TurboWash compared to a standard cycle?
LG rates TurboWash cycles at up to 30 minutes versus a standard 60-minute cycle for a full load. In our testing a full load ran about 28 minutes on TurboWash. The time savings are most noticeable on large loads — smaller loads cycle faster already, so the gap is less dramatic on half-loads.
Does TurboWash clean as well as a full cycle?
For normally soiled everyday laundry, yes. For heavily soiled items, the standard cycle produces marginally better results. LG recommends the standard cycle for items that need deeper cleaning, and we agree based on our testing.
Will a king-sized comforter fit in the 5.2 cu. ft. drum?
Yes. The 5.2 cu. ft. drum handles a king-sized comforter in a single load. That's one of the main reasons to choose this model over the 4.5 cu. ft. WM4000HBA. Bulky items that need two loads in the smaller machine fit in one here.
Can this washer be stacked with a dryer?
Yes, with a compatible LG dryer and the appropriate stacking kit. Check LG's compatibility guide for specific dryer pairings, as not every LG dryer works with this washer in a stacked configuration.
How does this compare to the LG WM4000HBA?
The main differences are capacity (5.2 vs 4.5 cu. ft.) and TurboWash technology. The 5.2 model is larger and faster on big loads, but it costs more and takes up more floor space. For households that wash king comforters, bulky towels, or a week of laundry for four people regularly, the upgrade is worth it. For a two-person household, the WM4000HBA is the smarter buy.
The LG 5.2 cu. ft. front-load washer with TurboWash 360 is the best washer in this lineup for high-volume households. The combination of the largest drum capacity and genuinely faster cycle times makes it the most productive single machine in our laundry roundup. For families running multiple loads every week, it's the right call.
That said, it's not for everyone. Smaller households and those with limited floor space will get better value from the LG WM4000HBA. Spend the money where it gets used.
